Jennifer R Carr, PT, DPT, OCS, PRPC
Background
Four weeks after her cesarean birth, CS shuffled into the outpatient physical therapy clinic gripping the hallway walls for balance as her concerned mother walked beside her with the baby in the stroller. The 29-year-old new mother was managing only four hours of sleep per night. Her incision burned with an unrelenting 8 out of 10 pain, her back ached, and every cough or sneeze brought a leak of urine and a spike of dread. She could cradle or feed her baby for just 5-10 minutes before pain or exhaustion forced her to stop. “I don’t feel safe alone with my baby,” she admitted. Her Perinatal Function and Mobility Scale score was 7 out of 24, and her Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory score was 193 out of 200. Numbers that demonstrated what I could see: a frightened, depleted parent, four weeks postpartum, already falling through the cracks of standard care.
If this scenario feels familiar, it’s because it is. Physical therapists are uniquely positioned to triage postpartum recovery; screening for red flags, stabilizing function early, and accelerating safe return to daily life; yet many patients never encounter PT until six weeks or later. Meanwhile, new parents face a plethora of challenges: neck and back strain from feeding and lifting, urinary or fecal incontinence, constipation, prolapse symptoms, and uncertainty around the return to full function, exercise, and sexual activity. For those with complications like hemorrhage or pelvic girdle dysfunction, the stakes are even higher. Despite cesarean delivery being the most common surgery in the United States, automatic rehab referrals remain rare, a striking contrast with orthopedic procedures that routinely receive referrals to post-op physical therapy.
Physical therapists are uniquely positioned to triage postpartum recovery; screening for red flags, stabilizing function early, and accelerating safe return to daily life; yet many patients never encounter PT until six weeks or later.
Impairment List
CS’s story underscores what timely, targeted rehabilitation can do. Her cesarean followed a labor that stalled; she lost an estimated 860 mL of blood and was discharged home on day three in stable condition. By her four-week evaluation on 4/16/26, she reported constant abdominal “fullness” near her incision, urinary urgency and stress incontinence, and pain in her cesarean scar during bowel movements. Her vitals were stable (BP 116/86, HR 98, SpO2 98%). But functionally, she was floundering: breath-holding with every transfer, two hands needed to rise from a chair, and an antalgic gait. Her cesarean scar scored 5 out of 13 on the Vancouver scale. Palpation revealed pubic symphysis tenderness; walking aggravated her pain. A simple clinic trial, positioning an abdominal binder low to cover the incision and layering pelvic ring support from the Baby Belly Band, cut her walking pain by half. The takeaway was immediate: proper support and pressure management can change everything.
The working diagnoses were post-cesarean incisional pain with hypersensitivity and suspected postpartum pelvic girdle dysfunction centered at the pubic symphysis. The fall risk was high and multifactorial: relative deconditioning after blood loss, sleep deprivation, and inefficient pressure strategies like breath-holding. Early postpartum ergonomics and the emotional load of postpartum depression added weight to the clinical picture. There were no initial wound infection red flags, though later moisture and odor around the incision prompted hygiene education and air exposure. And while her blood loss didn’t meet the postpartum hemorrhage threshold of 1000 mL, I remained vigilant for orthostasis, fatigue, tachycardia, and any changes in bleeding.
The working diagnoses were post-cesarean incisional pain with hypersensitivity and suspected postpartum pelvic girdle dysfunction centered at the pubic symphysis. The fall risk was high and multifactorial: relative deconditioning after blood loss, sleep deprivation, and inefficient pressure strategies like breath-holding.
Interventions and Communication with OB/GYN
The plan began with the basics, executed precisely. The binder was repositioned low to protect and offload the scar; the pannus was lifted to improve aeration and healing. The Frida Mom binder, worn correctly, offered better coverage than the binder she was provided at the hospital. A pelvic belt was layered over the binder for standing and walking, for added pelvic girdle support. Transfers were retrained with the deceptively simple cue, “Exhale as you exit,” replacing strain with controlled pressure. She learned to splint her incision with a towel when coughing, sneezing, or having a bowel movement. Bed mobility shifted to log rolling. Because her fall risk was substantial, a front-wheeled walker became nonnegotiable, and safety training was explicit and repeated.
Energy conservation mattered. Showers became brief, cooler, and seated, scheduled away from feeds. Meals were smaller and more frequent. Gentle walking and graded activity replaced sporadic exertion. Infant care moved to supported positions, including side-lying feeding, to protect the incision and lower back. Core and pelvic floor work began in familiar, nurturing positions: diaphragmatic breathing, gentle core compressions, pelvic tilts, heel slides, lower trunk rotation, and supported child’s pose, all choreographed with breath work. Pelvic floor activation was coordinated with her breath to manage swelling and urgency, and toileting mechanics were adjusted to reduce strain.
Crucially, I contacted her obstetrician the day of the evaluation to report that CS was unsafe to care for her baby alone. Her OB extended her leave due to delayed recovery. CS was told plainly: for now, she was not to be home alone with the baby. The clarity provided concrete safety and reduced the unspoken fear that had shadowed every step.
Results came quickly.
Results
By the next day, 4/17/26, the Berg Balance Scale revealed her at 22 out of 56, very high fall risk, validating the walker and justifying a conservative pace. Still, she arrived grateful: the binder worn low, the pelvic belt, the new breathing strategies, cooler showers, and smaller meals had already lightened the load. Her vitals remained stable. I suggested that she layered the baby belly band over the binder for pelvic ring support during standing activities; this felt supportive. Education continued, including scar hygiene as there was noticeable odor around the incision, and explicit reminders to avoid being home alone with the infant.
By 4/28/26, her blood pressure remained stable at 114/80 mmHg and her heart rate at 82 bpm; oxygen saturation was 97%. She still had tenderness above the scar, but the pain was calming, her energy was rising, and the oppressive sense of near-collapse was fading. Interventions expanded to bridging for bed mobility, hip hinging mechanics for bending and lifting, and gentle mobilizations and positions that felt restorative. She could now stand holding the baby for five minutes; a milestone that felt both ordinary and monumental.
At eight weeks postpartum, on 5/20/26, she had weaned off the walker inside her home. The Berg Balance Scale climbed to 47 out of 56, landing her in the low fall risk range. Her scar was dry and odor-free, ready for direct massage and progressive mobilization. She was now walking 20 minutes with her walker outside and was eager about doing more. Some back pain flared with activity, a predictable bump on the road of recovery that responded to gluteal and lumbar soft tissue work, progressive core strengthening, and careful dosing of load.
A week later, on 5/27/26, she strode into the clinic without a walker, beaming. She was walking 25 minutes outdoors without an assistive device. Her goals had shifted: less about surviving and more about rebuilding strength, mastering baby-caring mechanics, and putting her back pain in the rearview. The early wins, 50% to 70% immediate pain reduction with binder placement and belt support, better transfers with exhalation, safer mobility with a walker, had made way for deeper gains: confidence, capacity, and control.
Discussion
CS’s arc demonstrates how practical, early rehabilitation recalibrates recovery. The approach was simple but rarely standard: position the binder low over the incision for adequate healing; add pelvic support when upright for pelvic girdle pain; cue exhalation during exertion; teach transfers that protect the scar and pelvic floor; dose activity with energy conservation; and layer in progressive, symptom-guided core and pelvic floor training. At key moments, I signaled safety concerns to obstetrics, extending leave, and pacing progression around anemia recovery and sleep deprivation. The numbers tell the story, too: Berg 22 to 47 in five weeks; PFMS from 7/24 to 22 out of 24, walking with wall support to independent community ambulation; from fearing every transfer to practicing curl-ups and marches without a flare.
There are nuances worth noting. Moisture management around the incision mattered as much as mechanics. Fall risk screening belonged at the front door of postpartum care, not as an afterthought. The mantra “exhale as you exit” simplified complex pressure concepts into a usable daily habit. And postpartum depression remained a compass for pacing: some days meant consolidating gains, not pushing the plan.
At a population level, this case argues for a culture shift. If we accept that cesarean delivery is the most common surgery in the country, then rehabilitation should not be an optional extra. Early outpatient PT, ideally within the first six weeks, should be routine for high-priority presentations: post-cesarean recovery, grade 3-4 perineal tears, postpartum hemorrhage, pelvic girdle pain and any patient suffering from severe mobility and functional deficits. With standardized referral pathways, the “typical” postpartum trajectory could look more like CS’s finish than her start: safe, supported, and steadily moving forward.
For families and clinicians seeking facilities that integrate these early recovery models, the Postpartum Recovery Hospital Directory provides a comprehensive list of institutions offering specialized therapy after birth.
For CS, the win was tangible: she could now see herself as the mother she wanted to be. She could walk outside without a device, lift and care for her baby with confidence, and envision a return to exercise guided by her OB and PT. The path wasn’t glamorous. It was calm, consistent, and collaborative; exactly what early postpartum rehab should be.
About the Author
Dr. Jen Carr, PT, DPT, OCS, PRPC, is a physical therapist with over 16 years of experience who earned her Doctor of Physical Therapy degree from the University of Southern California, completed the USC Orthopaedic Physical Therapy Residency, became a Board-Certified Orthopaedic Clinical Specialist, and later earned her Pelvic Rehabilitation Practitioner Certification after extensive advanced training through the Herman & Wallace Pelvic Rehabilitation Institute. Inspired by her own postpartum recovery, Dr. Carr now serves as the Lead Pelvic Health Physical Therapist at St. John’s Women’s Health & Wellness Center, where she specializes in pregnancy and postpartum rehabilitation and is helping develop a comprehensive obstetric rehabilitation program that integrates inpatient and outpatient care.
References
- Segraves R, Segraves J, Sylvester K, et al. 15-hour ERAD training: How to grow an OB rehab program in the hospital and home. Enhanced Recovery After Delivery. https://enhancedrecoveryafterdelivery.com/program/#15hr
- ACOG Committee Opinion No. 736: Optimizing Postpartum Care. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;131(5):e140–e150, and updated guidance on postpartum care and return to activity.
- The Effect of Early Mobilization Protocols on Postoperative Outcomes Following Abdominal and Thoracic Surgery: A Systematic Review Surgery. 2016;159(4):991-1003.
- Simonds, Adrienne H. PT, PhD1; Abraham, Karen PT, PhD2; Spitznagle, Theresa PT, DPT, WCS3. Clinical Practice Guidelines for Pelvic Girdle Pain in the Postpartum Population. Journal of Women’s Health Physical Therapy 46(1):p E1-E38, January/March 2022. | DOI: 10.1097/JWH.0000000000000236
- Wormer KC, Jamil RT, Bryant SB. Postpartum Hemorrhage. Updated 2024 Jul 19. In: StatPearls [Internet]. 2026–. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK499988/ American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Practice Bulletin: Postpartum Hemorrhage. https://www.acog.org/clinical/clinical-guidance/practice-bulletin/articles/2017/10/postpartum-hemorrhage
- Verdicchio C, Freene N, Hollings M, et al. A Clinical Guide for Assessment and Prescription of Exercise and Physical Activity in Cardiac Rehabilitation. Heart Lung Circ. 2023;32(9):1035-1048.
- Weir A, Brukner P, Delahunt E, et al. Doha agreement meeting on terminology and definitions in groin pain in athletes. Br J Sports Med. 2015;49:768–774.
- Benjamin DR, et al. Systematic reviews and RCTs on diastasis recti and abdominal training (2014; 2018–2022), supporting tailored progressive abdominal rehabilitation.
- WHO and FIGO postpartum care summaries for clinical red flags and follow-up timing.
- Goyal D, Gay C, Lee KA. Fragmented maternal sleep is more strongly correlated with depressive symptoms than infant temperament at three months postpartum. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2009;12(4):229-237.
- MedBridge. Acute Rehab for the Perinatal Population 0–6 weeks After Delivery, by Rebeca Segraves, PT, DPT, WCS, CLT, and Jenna Segraves, PT, DPT, NCS, CLT.
